BGH

Posted in Art. 11 EnforD, Art. 12 EcomD, Art. 8(3) InfoSoc, BGH, CJEU, disconnecting injunctions, injunctions, safe harbours

AG Speaks Out On Accountability For Third Party Infringements Commited Via One’s Open WiFi
As many readers surely know by now, the much awaited Opinion of the Advocate General, Maciej Szpunar, in McFadden C-414/14 case has been released this week. To my great surprise, it is one of the best opinions on the E-Commerce Directive any member of the Court has ever produced (yes, even better than Maduro’s Google France
Read More
Posted in Art. 11 EnforD, Art. 8(1) EnforD, BGH, CJEU, injunctions

Munich Court Asks CJEU About Injunctions Against Operators of Open WiFis
Regional Court in Munich (LG München) last month filed a preliminary reference to the CJEU (Case 7 O 14719/12 – reported by OffeneNetze) asking several questions related to applicability of mere conduit safe harbour to free and open WiFis and also to possibilities of national courts to impose certain obligations on (non-liable) providers of such
Read More
Posted in BGH, CJEU, data protection, data scraping, database right, unfair comptetition

BGH: Screen Scraping Does Not Constitute Unfair Competition
German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) is in a new case on meta search engines and screen scraping — Flugvermittlung im Internet, I ZR 224/12 — again proving its superior expertise and better sense of the real world compared to the Court of Justice of the EU. In a case involving notorious litigant Ryaniar who sued
Read More
Posted in Art. 11 EnforD, Art. 14 EcomD, Art. 8(3) InfoSoc, BGH, DE, hosting, Liability of ISPs

BGH on Liability of Rapidshare
BGH today according to its press release decided in Atari Europe v. Rapidshare, known also as “Alone in the dark” (BGH, I ZR 18/11, LG Düsseldorf – 12 O 40/09).  The case concerns action brought by Atari Europe, the producer of well-known computer game “Alone in the dark”, against the file-hosting provider Rapidshare.  As the
Read More